O Supremo Tribunal da Austrália permitiu a uma mulher tirar e armazenar o esperma de noivo morto, que foi morto em passagem de nível.
A magistrada Roslyn Atkinson em uma decisão que acaba de ser publicada, deferiu o pedido urgente de Kelly Floyd para remover o esperma de seu companheiro Troy Jarvis, que foi morto por um trem em Brisbane, na manhã de 12 de julho. (Fonte Migalhas, versão e formatação deste blog De Beca e Toga).
Assisted reproductive treatment
Supreme Court allows woman's application to take and store sperm from dead fiance, who was killed at level crossing
A Brisbane Supreme Court judge granted an a woman's application to remove and store the sperm of her partner who was killed in a level crossing accident.
Justice Roslyn Atkinson, in a just published decision, granted Kelly Floyd's urgent application to remove sperm from her de facto husband, Troy Jarvis, who was killed by a train in Brisbane on the morning of July 12.
Justice Atkinson, in her six-page written order delivered "ex tempore'' last month, said Ms Floyd made the urgent application "orally by phone call'' to her associate within hours of Mr Jarvis's death. (Fonte: Migalhas)
A DECISÃO:
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: | Re Floyd [2011] QSC 218 |
PARTIES: | KELLY FLOYD (applicant) |
FILE NO/S: | SC No 6068 of 2011 |
DIVISION: | Trial Division |
PROCEEDING: | Application |
ORIGINATING COURT: | Supreme Court of Queensland |
DELIVERED ON: | Delivered ex tempore 12 July 2011 |
DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
HEARING DATE: | 12 July 2011 |
JUDGE: | Atkinson J |
ORDERS: | 1. The Court authorises the removal of any testes and spermatozoa from the deceased, Troy Jarvis; 2. The Court authorises the provision of that material removed to an IVF organisation nominated by the applicant, Kelly Floyd; 3. The Court authorises any blood tests advised by the IVF organisation to be carried out; and 4. The Court authorises the storage of the sperm obtained pending a future application to the Supreme Court for the use of that sperm. |
CATCHWORDS: | PROCEDURE – SUPREME COURT PROCEDURE – PERSONAL PROPERTY – OTHER CASES – whether the applicant was entitled to an order for removal of the deceased’s testes and spermatozoa Coroners Act 2003 (Qld), s 8(3)(b) Transplantation and Anatomy Act 1979 (Qld), s 23, s 24 Baker v State of Queensland [2003] QSC 002, cited Bazley v Wesley Monash IVF Pty Ltd [2010] QSC 118, cited Jocelyn Edwards; Re the estate of the late Mark Edwards [2011] NSWSC 478, followed (versão e formatação deste blog De Beca e Toga) |
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
O dia a dia de uma advogada, críticas e elogios aos juízes, notícias, vídeos e fotos do cotidiano forense